Additional notes: (no date entered - this one lies between 24 Mai and 3 October) [4] (the next entry in the Baptism Register is dated 1 October NOT 3 October)[3]
↑ Source: Nederduits Gereformeerde Gemeente (NGK), Tulbagh, Baptism register, 1743 to 2 Feb 1800, page 03, entry number 13. Repository: NG Kerkargief, Noordwal-Wes, Stellenbosch, G4 7/1. Transcribed by Lynn Couperthwaite, Trysie Joubert, Richard Ball as part of the eGGSA Project, from VC 657, Cape Archives Repository Seen and added by Gordon Mac Rae 28 Sep 2017.
↑
"Heese, J.A. & Lombard, R.T.J. “South African Genealogies 1” Human Sciences Research Council, 1992, ISBN 0-620-23962-1 v.1 p. 227"
Added on 2 Dec 2022 by Ian McArthur
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Dirk by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Dirk:
Please consider adding the two missing children to this profile Van_den_Berg-839 (her baptism record is on her profile); I can't find Jacobus Petrus van den Berg's profile yet. The vdBerg Family site is also useful- but it's a secondary source.
Hi, could you add the project profile [email address removed] to the trusted list of this profile [Privacy Tab] and then also activate it as active manager to this profile, please? And after moving yourself to the trusted list also send me a notice, thanks!
Van den Berg-1372 and Van den Berg-463 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicates. I'll do the final integration of the bio after the merge, thanks!
Van Den Berg-139 and Van den Berg-463 appear to represent the same person because: Same data, same parents, year of birth, though van den Berg-463 has the higher ID number, it has the correct spelling of the LNAB (lower case 'v' and 'd').